• BMatthew@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    Instead of pushing for a solution, we move nukes??? It’s time to push back on the military industrial complex and get diplomats working.

    • BoofStroke@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      It’s powered by nuclear, probably not carrying nuclear warheads.

    • lntl@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      the US doesn’t have any diesel-electric subs in service they’re all nukes

      • BMatthew@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        I understand that but we also know what the trident middle system on that ship can do and what it carries. That single sub out-powers most countries.

        • Clasm@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          That’s an SSGN. SSBN, the ones that carry Trident missiles, don’t need, nor want, to be anywhere near the theatre in order to operate.

    • SheeEttin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      We can do both.

      But note that “nuclear sub” refers to its power system, not armament. Nuclear subs can carry both nuclear and conventional weapons. This is not a threat to nuke Israel or Palestine.

      Edit: per articles quoting the Navy dude, this is a guided-missile sub, not a ballistic missile sub, meaning it only carries convention weapons, no nuclear weapons. That is, Tomahawk missiles.

      • Hotspur@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        From another article I read, this is a nuclear-powered sub, that is one of a handful that has been retrofitted from ballistic middle duty to cruise missles. So basically it’s a cruise missle platform. The headline is playing a little fast and loose for effect.

        Also worth considering that subs that launch nukes are assumed to be out, patrolling in enough areas to ensure last-word MAD deterrence, so you can just assume that US nuke-launching subs are already able to strike most major population centers and don’t need or want to broadcast their specific location (unless, like, a very intelligent former president specifically puts their location on a new broadcast for clout)