From the guy’s own mouth.

  • Hexadecimalkink@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    “The background was that President Putin declared in the autumn of 2021, and actually sent a draft treaty that they wanted NATO to sign, to promise no more NATO enlargement. That was what he sent us. And was a pre-condition for not invade Ukraine. Of course we didn’t sign that.”

    • BitPirate@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      “Don’t allow others to join your defense pact or we’ll demonstrate why it’s necessary in the first place.”

      Perfectly sane logic. Nothing strange.

          • Hexadecimalkink@lemmy.mlOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            You mean that it’s bad that the USA threatened to nuke Russia when Russia was putting missiles in Cuba, or when Russia invaded Ukraine when USA said they would put missiles in Ukraine? Was it bad the USA threatened nuclear war because Cuba wanted to defend itself from a belligerent neighbour? Russia backed off, should the US back off from Ukraine? Or “this is different”.

            • cnnrduncan@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Was it bad that Russia threatened nuclear way because Ukraine wanted to defend itself from a belligerent neighbour?

              The USA doing bad things in the past doesn’t make it alright for Russia to do the same bad shit.

            • Skua@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              It isn’t a team sport. We aren’t children. Both can, in fact, be wrong, and neither justifies the other.

        • cnnrduncan@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          So you’re alright with the way the US treats Cuba then? The USA did make it very clear that they wouldn’t tolerate Warsaw Pact expansionism near their borders, and Cuba could have just surrendered after the Bay of Pigs invasion to avoid all the negative consequences that have resulted from Cuba’s decision to oppose the freedom loving USA.

            • cnnrduncan@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yeah and the US made it very clear that they didn’t want USSR expansionism near their borders. Doesn’t make what the US has done to Cuba alright, just like it doesn’t make what Russia has done in Ukraine alright.

      • knfrmity@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, in 2004 and 2014 by covert and “diplomatic” US forces.

        This has never been about sovereignty and always about maintaining hegemonic imperialist control.

          • knfrmity@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            If you’re trying to claim that these events were driven by “Russian interference,” I have some hacked voting machines to sell you.

          • knfrmity@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            The US effectively did. There’s no other explanation for why US elected and career officials were present in Ukraine during small and violent anti-government protests, and there’s no other explanation for how and why the US state department chose the next leader of Ukraine after the democratically elected and widely supported President Yanukovych was forced to flee in fear for his life. Ukraine for all practical purposes lost its sovereignty in February 2014.

            If you’re talking about the small peninsula of Crimea, the residents of Crimea democratically chose to secede from Ukraine and rejoin Russia.

            It’s not easy, but it’s very much worth taking some time to understand what sovereignty and democracy actually mean, both in theory and in practice.

            • Skua@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              No, the US effectively didn’t. Russia actually did. It’s truly incredible that you’re promoting the results of a referendum held by an invading military force as legitimate and then telling me that I don’t understand democracy. You can’t have democracy at gunpoint. Would you be defending an American-run referendum to see if Basra wanted to join the USA in 2003? Because that is what you’re doing right now.

              • OrnluWolfjarl@lemmygrad.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                A couple things wrong with your comment:

                a) you are deflecting because you can’t answer

                b) you are seriously comparing an outright unprovoked invasion from US into Iraq, with one where Russia is defending Russian-speaking people against a Nazi-un government that has been bombing them for 8 years.

                c) even before the invasion, these people wanted to join up with Russia. They went all the way to Moscow multiple times to beg for Russia to intervene.

                d) it is obvious you know next to nothing about Ukraine and its situation. You only know what the US state department has told you and you repeat the exact same talking points.

                • Skua@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  A) It’s not deflection to limit a response to the parts most relevant to what I had actually asked.

                  B) I compared an unprovoked outright invasion to an unprovoked outright invasion. If you can annex land because there’s a civil war there and the people speak the same language as you, you’d be in favour of America annexing Ireland during the Troubles. Or Britain annexing it, for that matter. Never mind whether or not you’re fomenting the civil war in the first place.

                  C) I’m in favour of self-determination for people - hell, I want the place I live to leave the country hat it’s currently part of - but getting invaded is not self-determination.

                  D) Fun fact but you do not need to parrot the US State Department to think that Russia invaded Ukraine. If I was as virulently pro-America as you seem to think I am I probably wouldn’t be using a thing America did as a negative comparison, would I?

                  • OrnluWolfjarl@lemmygrad.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    A) it is when you ignore every single point except the one you can twist

                    B) and you were wrong

                    C) yet you’ve been minimizing the Ukrainian coup orchestrated by the US, and denying the right of self-determination to people in the Donbass

                    D) you didn’t use it as a negative at all. Nowhere in your comment do you condemn the Iraq war. In fact you are whitewashing it by implying that somehow the US should be praised for not doing ethnic cleansing (which they did, lest we forget the 1.5 million dead Iraqi)

              • knfrmity@lemmygrad.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                So a few things.

                If the election weren’t legitimate, why do Crimeans still stand by the decision they supposedly made at gunpoint to this day? Why don’t they remember there being Russian soldiers being present during the referendum? Why would Ukrainian citizens be welcomed into Crimeans communities now if this had simply been a nationalist land grab? Why didn’t Ukraine invest in Crimean infrastructure and social services between 1991 and 2014? Why would Russia invest in that same infrastructure and social services post 2014? Why weren’t Russian citizens allowed to vote in the referendum, only Ukrainians with Crimean residency?

                https://www.mintpressnews.com/return-russia-crimea-story-referendum-lives-since/262247

                Comparing this situation to the relationship between the US and Iraq/Basra is grotesque and intellectually dishonest so there’s no point in discussing that further.