• MehBlah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    Ubuntu just works. Its been my daily driver for nearly 20 years. I’ve had trouble from time to time but in the last ten years or so they have been fewer and fewer. I started with slackware and have many distros. Ubuntu is getting the job done. None of the other distros out there today bring more. I admit snaps are annoying but I slowly replace them on a new install.

    • AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      But you’re also promoting Ubuntu’s continued use, when Snaps are just one example of Canonical being antithetical to free software values. Mint is all the benefits of Ubuntu without that garbage, so why not that?

          • MehBlah@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            Yeah, what is your point? Ubuntu is literally a modified version of Debian. Of course Debian wasn’t created from any other distro. First time I tried it was in 96. The point I’m making is that there is a certain effete push away from the established status quo but there isn’t any real need for it.

      • tsugu@slrpnk.netOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        when Snaps are just one example of Canonical being antithetical to free software values

        No they are not. They are just another way of packaging apps that is specific to Ubuntu (and distros that can run Snap). The format has its flaws but calling it antithetical makes no sense.

        Also, I like Snaps. Ubuntu comes with Snap pre-installed. So I won’t be using Mint.

        • AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          Is the Snap backend available and open-source? If not, then it’s antithetical to software freedom because Canonical is trying to close their users into a walled garden in the ways that Apple and Google are with their app stores.

          There are plenty of software packaging systems that work just as well or better than Snap, and promote software freedom (Flatpak, Appimage, or even just traditional package managers). By using and promoting Snap over these, you are working against the growth of digital rights.

          • tsugu@slrpnk.netOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            6 days ago

            Snap works great for a lot of CLI software. All of the FOSS Snaps also publish their source code of how they are packaged. https://github.com/nextcloud-snap/nextcloud-snap , and the snap client app is FOSS too.

            I don’t care that the server is controlled by Canonical. Most Flatpaks are on Flathub and it’s not a problem.

            • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              6 days ago

              I don’t care that the server is controlled by Canonical. Most Flatpaks are on Flathub and it’s not a problem.

              If flathub became a problem, people could easily and openly switch another server.