• roguetrick@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Valve is the prime example of rent seeking behavior. It’s a private company that collects economic rents on a market thanks to that market being the biggest. They’re a private company and their only goal is to preserve those rents. They do that by fostering goodwill. They’re everything I hate about capitalism, but I don’t hate them for doing it.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I don’t think Steam is rent-seeking because:

      • no cost to maintaining an account
      • no cost for keys if you sell stuff outside the Steam store
      • no cost for downloads
      • no cost for improvements to games

      Valve’s customers are publishers and devs, and they’re charging a finder’s fee for connecting customers to the games. To me, that’s not rent seeking, that’s a direct exchange of money for a service. If you don’t think the service is valuable or think you can do better, then generate keys and sell them elsewhere and you won’t need to pay Valve a cut.

      Valve is capitalism done right imo. You only pay when you receive a service, and only when you profit from the service. Steam also has a fantastic refund policy as well, which is surprisingly rare in the digital goods market.

    • kameecoding@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      somebody doesn’t understand what rent seeking is.

      Valve is not doing rent-seeking…

      they have created a service that didn’t exist that’s beneficial to both the consumer and the seller, they don’t do any anti-competitive shit with it as far as I am aware.

      in what world is what they do rent-seeking?

      are you an edgy 15 year old that just learned a new word and didn’t understand it?