Can’t this be solved by updating requirements to allow vehicle sales?
Can’t this be solved by updating requirements to allow vehicle sales?
yea this “attack” could potentially sink closedAI with lawsuits.
I don’t see any problem with removig car dealers. Just phase out of existence no one will miss them.
There are reasons why it would be better at generating some things better than others in a way that’s roughly proportional to the disparity of training data volume used in the model.
I hope they put some failsafe so that it cannot take action if the estimated casualties puts humans below a minimum viable population.
disgusting. it doesn’t surprise me. publishers are continously testing how much their customers can bend over.
why limit yourself when you can get a paycheck and enjoy your job at the same time? consider how many hours of your life you spend at work.
Absolutely. ignoring the issue is not going to help. not sure how we can pressure “city designers” (no clue how it actually works) to effect the change.
I think it’s likely a nation state. the gay furry claim is just a distraction.
Can you even afford a car? I somehow doubt it. you have that typical attitude of wanting to ban the things that are outside your reach.
If their values are incompatible and they are inflexible they made a mistake and should relocate.
well now this is getting interesting beyond gossip. I doubt they made a significant AGI-related breakthrough but it might be something really cool and useful.
That’s the usual sentiment in social media comments but in reality most people don’t behave this way. We need to live in the real world if we want to change it. Living a delusion and expecting others to support it is not going to help in reality.
I mean until recently more people used to die in car accidents than by gunfire. It was the leading cause for kids. I am not advocating for lack of concern. But making cars less useful it’s not a solution since people still have to commute long distances in some countries. You have to weigh the benefits against the costs. If you believe that pedestrians should always be prioritized then you should be advocating for a complete ban on cars
you keep changing the subject. the claim is that “capitalism cannot innovate” I give clear obvious examples and you keep rejecting them on the basis of your lack of understanding on the topic. i.e. you say word2vec is useless or somehow related to openAI. the vaccines might be more in your domain knowledge since you didn’t call them useless and try to confuse the topic. I’m not here to educate you so if you use ignorance as an argument I’m just going to point it out and move on.
to claim that you can’t have innovation with capitalism anymore is not even related to claiming that you need capitalism to innovate. are you really that extremist in your reasoning? it’s either completely useless or absolutely required?
I guess i should not waste my time with you and you can keep your loser/doomer mentality.
ClosedAI didn’t invent word2vec. There are so many examples of innovation being driven or enabled by capitalism that it’s really strange that people assert capitalism cannot innovate and when given examples they reject then. Are mrna vaccines also useless?
I was responding to the claim that “capitalism cannot innovate “ i am aware that innovation generally is not the goal but that is not the point i am contesting.
ok, I don’t see why you could not create something “useless” if that’s all you need to get funding… openAI didn’t have microsoft. startups that have “useless” ideas don’t “have people” either. they have innnovations (or useless ideas according to you) . Most people with an opinion on the topic should be able to understand the value of word2vec and form an opinion on the vailidty of your perspective.
if it’s so useless why have you not created a similar sham to get billions in funding? is word2vec and similar breakthroughs also non-innovative or shams in your views?
I was thinking hopefully this one won’t be extremely political but my hopes died when I noticed the name of Op.