MaybeALittleBitWeird

31M, Bi, kinky, goofy, and a little queer. I’m just here to look at naked people being sexy and having fun - please don’t message me unless you’d like to have a legitimate conversation.

  • 0 Posts
  • 40 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 3rd, 2023

help-circle

  • Glad to hear you like it. I get it, I figured out the deal when I saw the modlist for the comm and I know you’ve already got a heavy mod load. If some of the heavier posters get on board it would definitely be a positive change at least.

    I thought about this only now upon revisiting this post, but there might come an issue with classifying futa. Yiffit uses a [G] tag for gynomorph but I don’t think that would work quite as well over. Maybe just a [T] or [Futa] would suffice.


  • Mostly vanilla, but likely still applies. Honestly, I’m in the same situation and have been working to fix it since it is something that my partner quite enjoys.

    I’ve got a one-track mind and have a tendency to just focus on what I’m doing and when I am vocal it’s more light-hearted and laugh inducing. Dirty talk has always felt…awkward to me, but the easiest way I’ve found to transition into talking dirtier is focus on simple “I/You like” statements or observations.

    “I know you like the way it feels…” “I love how you feel…” “I love the way you look when you…”

    Things of that nature to break the ice so to speak and the rest of it evolves like any normal conversation would. The specifics for your friend will come down to chemistry, but it gets easier the more you do it.


  • @[email protected] @[email protected]

    I think that’s actually a very good criticism and would be a good topic for a rules update discussion on any of the Hentai communities that don’t include it already. A simple and consistent tag system would be a good addition to the rules and prevent this type of situation.

    Edit since I can’t copy paste sidebar text in Jerboa apparently:

    Below is the tag system used by most Yiffit communities and could be used with success here as well. There are some further ones for the more specific communities, but I don’t think we would need anything more in depth than this.

    "Please indicate the gender pairing with one of the following tags in the title:

    [M] for a single male.
    [F] for a single female.
    [M/F] or [F/M] for pictures only containing straight interactions.
    [M/M] for images only containing male on male interactions.
    [F/F] for images only containing female on female interactions.
    [Bi] for pictures in which the characters are involved in multiple types of straight, gay and/or lesbian interactions."
    








  • I’m not a photographer by any means so generally I’m judging a photo based on overall composition and personal appeal rather than the technical ability in producing it. I have an observational astronomy background so I’m not completely ignorant to some of the technical aspects but a lot of the specifics to the shot setup are probably lost on me.

    Don’t ever apologize for simply enjoying something that you’re clearly passionate about. I always appreciate seeing passion(within reason), even if I don’t necessarily always agree.

    Thank you for the link clarifying the forced perspective because I was absolutely was thinking of that but could not for the life of me think of the term. I’m glad you knew what I meant because I genuinely considered drawing an optical ray diagram to try to illustrate.

    I think using the second picture of the same model from a different angle does show that it’s probably not a temporary set at least and gives a better sense of the background coloring because they used a more neutral light color. It honestly looks like it was a shot in the upstairs hallway of someone’s house to me and there’s a wall mounted AC unit partially hidden in the background.

    I think overall my main issue is with the harsh outlining of the wall corners with light to give them a neon-like effect is probably what ruins this piece for me. It’s a very intentional stylistic choice and the shot wouldn’t look right without it, but I guess it just doesn’t vibe with me. Looking over the rest of this same photographers scenes though they have got some awesome pictures and are absolutely phenomenal with their lighting overall.



  • I’m not saying it’s trick photography or a trick of the lighting, just perspective creating the illusion of depth in the background.

    I could be way off base here, but the backdrop is meant to look like a hallway when in reality it’s maybe a foot or two deep set piece of two inscribed rectangles. The choice of the shimmering, underwater lighting effect highlights the hard lines on the backdrop(specifically in the bottom right) and ruins this illusion, for me at least. It also draws the eye away from the model as a focus in my opinion and the piece comes off as a bit busy because of it. I’m easily distracted though 😂