I’m destroyed. I cut and pasted funko-pops to google it and check spelling, now I am a fool on the internet 😔
I’m destroyed. I cut and pasted funko-pops to google it and check spelling, now I am a fool on the internet 😔
Yeah but how many different types of would I have if we didn’t have capitalism??
This whole exchange is interesting, but the second half I think this sums this point well.
Ultimately any real world problem has lots of history and different justifications, and I think mask of nuance is being weaponized to pull the conversation out of reality and into a rhetorical space of inaction.
Rad! Yeah Arch is definitely has the mentality of, “Why would I need all that swooping pictures stuff when this HTML file works just fine?”
I currently use EndeavourOS, basically arch with an installer, and it’s been great for me because, with all it’s ‘simplicity’ and conciseness, the arch community is really great for documentation. And the Arch User Repository is an amazing tool.
Can I ask, are you in the linux community and just commenting on Arch’s choices, or was this your first look at this sort of thing and are noting your observations? No judgment either way, just curious.
To your point, the definition arch is using is computationally simple, as in fewer ‘moving parts’. In that vein, I think the aesthetic of some HTML on an information dense page makes sense. But I can see why it doesn’t fit with what most would consider simple design with their computers.
I was curious about your experience with it, because starting using linux with arch a bit on the deep end, and other distros have more inviting set ups (and web pages). In fact I would say almost every single one is more welcoming in the sense you’re describing than arch. To the counter point though, at a certain point the fluff of a lot of web pages end up as bothersome distraction, and arch caters to avoiding that sort of design.
Does Windows not have a compose key?
I don’t know too much about self hosting, so it might be worth asking on a self-hosting community to see the specific issues. But from my ignorance I think there are some hindrances with smaller servers and the speed of their comments propagating through the fediverse.
Beyond that I think there is something that would jump out as a bit strange to folks if every comment or post was from @username@theirLiteralHomeIP, and If they are running on a phone their IP would be really volatile which might run into issues as well.
So I don’t think there is anything fundamentally wrong individualized instances, but there are like practical issues with it. Further, it is certainly not foolproof, but different cultures of different servers has worked well in the fediverse to allow blocking posts from spaces that you don’t wish to experience. If each user had a separate instance it would be much harder to do in practice.
Again, I’m a dumb dumb, so I would hope that someone with more knowledge can clarify, I’m just speculating on what I could see being issues 😅
It seems like you are building on criticisms of LLMs and applying them to something that very different. What poisoned data do you imagine this model having in the future?
That is a criticism of LLMs because new generations are being trained on writing that could be the output of LLMs, which can degrade the model. What suggests to you that this fusion reactor will be using synthetic fusion reactor data to learn when to stop itself?