I prefer to use statisics rather than anecdotal evidence. The stack overflow survey shows full stack pretty far down:
I prefer to use statisics rather than anecdotal evidence. The stack overflow survey shows full stack pretty far down:
Why would you think full stack developers make more money in general?
It’s still too easy to install apps. You xan just type a parent’s password on the kid’s device to continue.
That was always the joke but some people prefer in-joles (i.e. already knowing they have identical faces) over being inclusive and showing the joke at face value. I can appreciate both, depending on finesse.
This joke doesn’t really have any finesse so my vote is for inclusivity.
With this as a guide, it would be enough if the task needed to be done twice per day to break even after five years.
That’s why you never ever write the filename manually. Always copy paste it!
I go by: “Do boring things fast and fun things slowly.”
“A”.reverse() === “A”
Might be because I’ve been reporting all sponsored content as spam.
Starbucks isn’t Italian, for one.
You would have to pay off the 250 k debt though, if you want to keep the house. You can’t give the house away without paying the debt first.
The one inheriting the house may want to take a 250k loan to afford that 300k house.
I have an alias that tries both names
Redis, rabbitmq. There are infrastructure where all nodes work but only one node is responsible for properly and timely synchronizing changes, which is a hard problem to solve in a distributed fashion.
Yes, both of those may already be servers
Interesting typo. Almost like a Freudian slip but with melting batteries instead.
It has similarities though, as pointed out in orher comments. For one, a user might be more careful with downvotes if they are afraid of negative consequences e.g. harassment. With piblic votes, there would therefore be a bias towards upvotes and and people abstaining from downvotes, i.e. less interaction in total.
Downvotes serve a purpose today, letting us quickly scan which comments are controversial or even harmful to the conversation. I, for one, usually sort most threads by votes and then skip the comments with many downvotes but for controversial topics, I instead seek out the comments that have both many upvotes and downvotes.
These would be harder to find given the above bias.
“Never install, carry or handle”. OK but what are they for then?
I guess that wouldn’t help the deaf people though. (:
I just wanted to add about the stares. Photos back then required the target to be very still ao they are just probably trying their best to keep still.
Most photos of children failed because they moved. These were very still, hence the tension in their eyes, or just a lucky shot. Anyways, photos from way back always look like death for this reason.
“It depends” is a good answer, and is in line with me questioning the above comment.
Here’s a link to a recent huge worldwide study: https://survey.stackoverflow.co/2024/work#salary