I guess I’m worried primarily about internal enemies too, but I don’t think we’d agree on which entities are the problem for some reason…
I guess I’m worried primarily about internal enemies too, but I don’t think we’d agree on which entities are the problem for some reason…
Imagine being the warehouse employee who opened the package
i are, I generally have to make about the corrections per message in order for it to even be legible
(left it in all its glory for you guys)
Me too, eyelash extensions that rival the city’s stadium in importance.
Wtf, breaches aside why would a health care company be working with advert companies?
Active support of something totally morally unacceptable seems more morally culpable than refusing to participate. I don’t think most people are consequentialists—the how matters.
I haven’t played around with them, are the new models able to actually reason rather than just predictive text on steroids?
That’s a lot of nozzles
Oh no, how will people know if their opinions are right or wrong without our top most social ethicists?
At my first full time job my supervisor specified that I could hang up on anyone who brought up their lawyer, used abusive language, or brought up the BBB.
You can make fresh spinach last longer if you layer in some napkins/paper towels (something something moisture, I don’t really know the science).
People are always like “it doesn’t do anything we couldn’t do with SQL,” as if riding a horse isn’t an improvement in transportation over walking. Things don’t have to be impossible to accomplish in any other way in order to be marginally more useful or efficient depending on the goal. Public ledgers are indeed useful. Blockchain is one technology among a small handful that might be appropriate for your project depending on trust dynamics it demands. Consensus protocols are also useful.
One example, right now our global food supply’s movement and distribution is based largely on market dynamics. Say we want to focus on distribution based on need instead. A blockchain based ledger could allow a fred to ‘commit’ a few bushels of carrots which george ‘commits’ to transporting to mike, who in turn has committed to do do a supply run to Uruguay with his barge. Could they have done this in excel? Probably. Would it be more organized on blockchain? Yes. Would a regular database with a lot of contributors that is carefully designed to keep out bad actors work too? Yes, sure.
Everything is more expensive where I am but local mexican restaurants have stayed the most reasonable (more so than chains). Chain-wise I think subway is still pretty affordable.
Our collective toilet thoughts are going to fuel the future of robot rhetoric guys
That sounds about right to me, maybe throw in government supported and nonprofits
I do—I support a handful of creators (including some web content creators) directly via patreon, and donate to the important guys like wiki and craigslist. I don’t support any news organizations and am not sure how they’ll pivot.
I already click right back out of websites that don’t make it easy to reject cookies or ask for an email. I certainly won’t be registering anywhere and will find other ways to get the information I need. At this point I am immediately turned off by anything that relies heavily on ad-revenue to exist anyway.
Some of the more metro ones often have tool libraries, art you can rent, and other neat misc resources too.
Edit: also free trips to local museums or zoos/aquariums
The only part I feel confident with right now is safely obtaining the media. I’m fine with that step being manual.
Boys becoming Men, Men becoming Bears