I think it’s not relevant.

Aren’t these people supposed to be gun nutz? What the actual fuck you 🤡 get your shit together.

I’m just glad this fucker is old. Could you imagine if we had to put up with this shit for 20 more years?

He’s done regardless after this run.

Democrats: “We don’t count that as political violence, because political violence is between people, and we don’t count Gazans as people”

Second attempt just doesn’t hit the same

Instructions unclear. Bank account emptied by looking at link.

2020 was a glorious year for punching fascists.

Yeah some of my team members use hf and it really does represent a convenience (basically a GitHub for models), but I’m sure to be clear we can’t rely on them alone. I don’t trust any company to exist or not be bought out and enshittified in 3 years.

What they do is retweet moms in Ohio

Bruh 😎 just steal everything 😜 every thing that isn’t nailed 👇 down

Trees planted in a line with clear cuts in the distance…

Looks like corporate profits to me.

search bobs an vagene

big bobs

harry vegene

Ikr? It really seems like the dismissiveness is coming from people either not experienced with it, or just politically angry at its existence.

I mean I’ve been doing this for 20 years and have led teams from 2-3 in size to 40. I’ve been the lead on systems that have had to undergo legal review at a state level, where the output literally determines policy for almost every home in a state. So you can be as dismissive or enthusiastic as you like. I could truly actually give a shit about ley opinion cus I’m out here doing this, building it, and I see it every day.

For any one with ears to listen, dismiss this current round at your at your own peril.

Yeah I skimmed a bit. I’m on like 4 hours of in flight sleep after like 24 hours of air ports and flying. If you really want me to address the points of the paper, I can, but I can also tell it doesn’t diminish my primary point: dismiss at your own peril.

We can finally get back to leftist infighting

Dismiss at your own peril is my mantra on this. I work primarily in machine vision and the things that people were writing on as impossible or “unique to humans” in the 90s and 2000s ended up falling rapidly, and that generation of opinion pieces are now safely stored in the round bin.

The same was true of agents for games like go and chess and dota. And now the same has been demonstrated to be coming true for languages.

And maybe that paper built in the right caveats about “human intelligence”. But that isn’t to say human intelligence can’t be surpassed by something distinctly inhuman.

The real issue is that previously there wasn’t a use case with enough viability to warrant the explosion of interest we’ve seen like with transformers.

But transformers are like, legit wild. It’s bigger than UNETs. It’s way bigger than ltsm.

So dismiss at your own peril.

Again, dismiss at your own peril.

Because “Integrate two badly documented APIs” is precisely the kind of tasks that even the current batch of LLMs actually crush.

And I’m not worried about being replaced by the current crop. I’m worried about future frameworks on technology like greyskull running 30, or 300, or 3000 uniquely trained LLMs and other transformers at once.

Machine learning scientist.