I never endorsed it. Sure, it may be justified, but that doesn’t make it legal.
I never endorsed it. Sure, it may be justified, but that doesn’t make it legal.
An associate of mine defines stealing as, “taking (either by cloning or removing) something (either digital or physical) of which is not of your original possession”
If anyone has a rebuttal, please help.
Edit: What’s with the downvotes? I’m on your side.
The only “health risk” there is in abortions is making a biological system function incorrectly. Even if the mother is in danger, there are many other solutions than termination (C-Sections for a start).
And, let’s just say it’s okay for rape/incest, those only account for about 3% of abortions (feel free to fact-check me on that).
The only “misinformation” here is pro-choicers trying to silence pro-lifers trying to fight for what they believe in.
“If you had just read the fine print, you would have realized that you’re not actually owning and they could take it away at their own discretion.” - an associate of mine
So you’re saying we shouldn’t consume content?
IRC anyone?
Linux Mint would like to have a word with you.
Corporate needs you to find the difference between"Advanced Windows Settings" and “Control Panel”
They’re the same picture.
Or (If you have the storage), yt-dlp.
Does anyone know if Photopea is Open Source? I can’t really find much on it.
And even if you can’t, there’s mage.space, albeit if you wanted NSFW it’s $5 a month, but my point is there are other options if you really want it.
Blind people. Really offensive to say something that other people can’t experience themselves.
That’s no call to action, all those lyrics are saying is that the author believes God will punish them, he’s not telling everyone else to do the same.
Man, I can say “The sky is blue” and someone will say it’s hate speech.
I just right-click and click “save image as” before the watermark is generated.
I can understand someone feeling different than how they were born, it’s all fine and dandy.
But another species?