I already don’t trust any Google result that has “AI” anywhere near it, and barely even the rest anymore.
I already don’t trust any Google result that has “AI” anywhere near it, and barely even the rest anymore.
Yes, but was this specific one a result, or was it a 5 second fake because haha meme?
I’m already pretty skeptical of “AI” in the LLM-algorithm-hell sense, but that doesn’t mean people don’t make things up for shits and giggles.
Please tell me this is fake. I need to hear these words.
I distinctly remember this joke when 2000 or ME was the most recent one.
So don’t?
Oh, no no, capitalism welcomes competition, don’t’y’know.
Just as long as it doesn’t mess with the profit margins.
Yeah, bad faith participation is awesome if you have an excuse.
Have you considered maybe your “participation” is just insufferable even if it weren’t blatantly bad faith?
Ha! Get rekt, Meta.
I’ve been mildly curious about RDR2. It’s been on sale a couple times, but I still feel… icky about the idea of giving Take2 any money.
“Finally”? Barf.
It emphatically does not mean that. Tankies tend to shill for Russia and China (CCP), neither of which is communist or socialist. I don’t even mean that in a “no true scotsman” way, they are literally market economies with astronomical wealth inequality.
nothin personnel, kid
But your point was that this is actively keeping people on Discord? By extension, that must mean that a significant bulk of those 150M users are kept on Discord because it has PluralKit. How do you reconcile that with the group of plurals being, apparently, quite small? To the point where even on Beehaw/Lemmy almost nobody seems to even have heard of it.
Interesting argument. I’d be curious if you know roughly how many plural people there are (let’s say headcounts as there’s only one body) compared to Discord’s user base. (150 million active users per month according to random half-assed google search)
Quality reference in the title though.
Sure, that’s fine. I use interactive rebase for “cleaning” a lot. I’m just saying it doesn’t make a difference for diffing (as you can diff any commit against any other) and doing it as a matter of routine sounds like it could skip potentially useful history.
I mostly rebase but if a branch has things happen in a sequence that matters, I would merge it instead, for example.
Squashing seems like you’d potentially lose out on info and have a harder time isolating the changes you’re looking through. I guess it depends on how much has been changed and whether some of the commits along the branch were more important than others.
I also don’t think the reset is necessary, you should be able to diff the branch head against whatever you want.
“Troll logic” is one of my favorite memes.
Exactly like being hit by lightning at any instant has a 50% risk because either it happens or it doesn’t.