Mozilla gotta do something.

And based on their actions on recent years, that something is probably going to be: 1) firing more developers, and 2) increasing the compensation of their CEO.

What’s a “home muffin”?

I don’t think anyone would overlook one of the most mentioned features everywhere for the past three months.

He needs a contract to make money. Putting his episodes on YouTube without being paid to do it would benefit Google.

The message he’s sending is: “if you want my show, pay me”.

The $250 he would earn with Adsense on YouTube is irrelevant.

• interactive widgets
• widgets on the desktop
• option to disable mouse acceleration (finally!!)
• support for hearing aids (I’ve been waiting for this one for years)
• can now change text size per app
• other apps can access passwords, so you can finally use your Safari passwords on chrome

And these are only the OS changes that I care about. I’m sure there are more.

So our options should be to accept a company that prevents us from using 100% of OUR phones, or choosing the crappy competitor?

That’s a lose-lose scenario. Why would anyone defend it?

They’re illegal in the country I live in. I mostly meant they should be illegal basically everywhere.

All of that has been predicted by Marx since the 19th century. And he already created a better system.

It’s called knowledge, and it’s not fair to prevent people from using their knowledge.

Apple already have their patents. That’s what patents are for! The startup can’t do exactly what Apple did, or they would be sued. The startup will have to use their knowledge to create NEW tech, and that’s an excellent result.

Non-compete clauses should be illegal (or done like in Denmark, like the example of our fellow commenter here)

The amount of ethics of any leader is irrelevant in capitalism. The system itself demands the creation of monopolies and constant growth. If you try to be a good person, some other company will “win the race” and take you out of the competition one way or another.

Expecting or demanding ethics of people is trying to fix the wrong problem, while the solution is toppling the entire system.

If we say “not pro repair” is “anti-repair”, we lose the meaning of what being anti-repair is.

Both are not helping the consumer, but one much more than the other.

Animals have rights in almost every country in the world.

More countries should do that. And should also ban Facebook-owned apps, TikTok, and other spyware on those official phones.

Why wouldn’t they?

Before this law, I mean.

You’re missing what they said.

I have quit from more than 10 companies (i’m old), and I’d say that 100% of the time the reason was shitty managers.

But “A raise in pay” would be the best solution to convince to me stay.

That’s the worst case of anxiety I’ve ever seen.

You’re NEVER going to NEED a tab. Just close them.

Nice try, Mr. Hackerman!

Reason number one: it’s a publicly traded American company.