While true on paper, they don’t have any actual power here.
While true on paper, they don’t have any actual power here.
I’m working on making robots do useful things. I think that’s fairly easy for most people to understand.
Well, if that’s how it worked before, they must’ve changed it. I installed it last night without paying and it never blocked me.
we can only do that in our fiction
At present, yes. The hypothetical is in the future, possibly in one where we’ve developed interstellar travel and we can be the ones visiting the alien planet.
since they are by definition far beyond our technology
How so? Aliens aren’t going to suddenly come into existence and have super-human technology in that same instant.
Are you talking about DeArrow? The website gives you the option to pay or just download without paying.
Or “I thought you guys might find this interesting”
All you really need for tasty roasted potatoes is salt, which you wouldn’t be able to see. Paired with some garlic mayo ideally.
To be fair, you can find nearly any book for free online.
In the context of the American general public, a healthy burger would require a very different ratio of meat to bun to veggies, at which point most people probably wouldn’t call it a burger anymore.
There are so many different types of tofu and different ways to prepare them that all taste vastly different. That stuff is basically a blank canvas.
Next door in the other direction
there are traits exhibited by conscious entities which we don’t observe in those which lack consciousness.
Implying we have a way of determining whether an entity is conscious or not. That’s the entire point of contention here.
On the topic of knives, it’s more important to have a way to keep them sharp. No knife will stay sharp for long with consistent use.
Could be. Classification is a type of problem. LLM is a type of model. You can use LLMs to solve classification problems. There’s a good chance that’s what’s happening here.
development of this model over the years required X TWh of power
This part is kind of hard to measure. When do you start counting? From the first work that informed the research direction eventually leading to this model? From the point where the concept of this final model first came about? Do you split the energy usage between multiple models that came from the same work?
We’ve already gone through “very”, “truly”, “really”, “actually”, and probably many more. I just don’t think humans were meant to have an antonym for “figuratively”. It’s too much power for any single person to wield.
Traffic dynamics are really interesting. Even after you clear the obstruction, the traffic jam remains and becomes a “ghost jam” that propagates backwards down the road until it eventually fizzles out.
Much faster to skim the contents of an article than a video.