Bringing evidence from the future is cheating. They wouldn’t believe you if you told them the truth but if you say you are a terrorist and placed a bomb in the world trade center, they might evacuate it

Ad hominem arguments never work very well. Just admit you don’t have all the answers to this totally relevant question and move on.

You’re confusing the law that applies for the ruling class with the one that applies to common people

Getting therapy isn’t easy on this side of the pond either from what I’ve heard, but it’s possible

Literally Capitalist Realism by Mark Fisher

You’re not obligated to know all the available science and the tweet is doesn’t state it as fact so it’s ignorant of the science but not in denial

If this is serious, it doesn’t work and there are other businesses claiming to be like L1 acquisition.

But the age window is real. Kids who for some reason didn’t learn any language have a hard time learning it later and when you move to other language area, there is an age after which you can’t learn the new language accent free (about 12 I think)

Just kidding

removed

That’s because you don’t know about those who don’t

Ad hominem arguments are never good

Either that or the trend is over and we have a new, similarity ridiculous trend

Wait, you aren’t my family? You lied to me!

I think ultimately, the effect is similar to this and have no longterm effect.

Also I was joking. Everyone who sees this news knows Disney. Still, I don’t think it will harm Disney substantial. Everyone knows it’s evil and consume their products anyway.

Think about it that way: how many people read this news who never heard anything about Disney before?

All publicity is good publicity

Maybe spinoff would work better. Using the worldbuilding and asking what happened next. I was told once that The Lives of Others (Das Leben der Anderen), 2006 is set in the same universe and the same country, but this might be head canon, donno

Downfall (Der Untergang), 2004

You call it a trilogy because you reject the fourth one

I call it trilogy because I reject the first one

We are not the same

Jokes aside, I would call 2&3 a long movie, which makes it a trilogy again. One mistake is to see them as separate

I love how the last full paragraph shifts the narrative from tooting in general is strange to normalizing 2 toots, but a 3rd one???