I’m not trained in formal computer science, so I’m unable to evaluate the quality of this paper’s argument, but there’s a preprint out that claims to prove that current computing architectures will never be able to advance to AGI, and that rather than accelerating, improvements are only going to slow down due to the exponential increase in resources necessary for any incremental advancements (because it’s an NP-hard problem). That doesn’t prove LLMs are end of the line, but it does suggest that additional improvements are likely to be marginal.
The one colleague using AI at my company produced (CUDA) code with lots of memory leaks that required two expert developers to fix. LLMs produce code based on vibes instead of following language syntax and proper coding practices. Maybe that would be ok in a more forgiving high level language, but I don’t trust them at all for low level languages.
Who’s said bye to DVDs?
Because it reports sources known to be unreliable (like Jerusalem Post and EuroNews) as Highly Trustworthy
without compromising on visual fidelity
But it does compromise. Netflix has the worst banding issues in low-light scenes of any of the streaming services I’ve tried. It’s hard not to notice and it’s very annoying.
For me, I can take chips on an empty stomach all right around breakfast time (not that I would generally want to). Later in the day, if I don’t eat protein or fat before eating the chips, I’ll get a headache and joint pain. In the evening, I’ll often get pain regardless of what I eat.
And they give you a headache if you eat them at the wrong time
Yeah Startpage and Ecosia too
That is the neutral answer. It’s objectively and demonstrably correct.
bad bot
I don’t think anyone on the left is claiming that Arch has the same level of complication as Windows
good
What about people ignoring the possibility of a comet hitting the earth?
Why is it that fascists’ source is always “some guy on Twitter said so” lol
“Outrage” seems a bit overly dramatic. “Expected outcome” would be more fitting.
Unnecessary, since Spain isn’t trying to deny access to key scientific information
Unsurprising to see redfash once again advocating for genocide and destruction as “humanitarian”
Is this a serious question? The existence of exceptions doesn’t negate the trend. The crackdown on draft dodging is part of Zelenskyy’s anti corruption measures to bring Ukraine in line with EU and NATO standards. Do you think about your questions at all before asking them?
Ukrainians would disagree; they’re the ones to want to fight and if their government tried to give up, they’d throw them out and find someone willing to keep going