It is a web site for specifically designed for pushing an agenda

So does Fox News, CNBC, MSNBC, etc etc

Let alone that this site does publish news about Housing, Child Care, Paid Leave etc

Google doesn’t have standards. They only follow whatever makes them a profit

Except they have standards for their news aggregation service

https://www.searchenginejournal.com/how-to-get-listed-in-google-news/379701/

checking the About page

“We also to report on current events and news related to population decline while dispute false analysis about what causes population decline”

They still report on news about what they think related to their name

Antitrust news sites report about antitrust

Environment news sites reports on the environment

Etc etc

Like the Financial Post?

Not to mention which standards?

Google News standards?

https://news.google.com/publications/CAAqBwgKMNK8ngwwkdqvAw?ceid=US:en

Honestly, it looks like you can’t find fault in the article information, so you are making a respectability argument so you can attacking the source

Uhhhhhhhhhhhh

Did you even read the article?

It’s blame worsing worker conditions and higher college tuition as part of the reason

In the newsletter they sent out, they issued a retraction and updated the title

The old link redirects now to the proper post now

Low Birthrates aren’t the problem

The problem here is low birthrates are caused the despair and hopelessness of the young

Except

1. Young Koreans aren’t getting better jobs
2. Housing isn’t slowing down fast enough
3. Yoon and South Korean Government are trying to raise working hours

Koreans are having a low birth rate because they are destroying their youth

Except we need really tight labor shortages to jack up wages and house prices to go down

Common consensus at this point it’s a social economics newssite with a spicy name

Yes, as I call them dipshits

and I pointed out 00’s New Labour increased social spending, and British TFR can be even higher with a party that’s proper left instead of New Labour’s dipshit right

New Labour despite being dipshits did increase social spending including education during 2000 to 2008, just imagine how much higher with something a bit more proper

The part of population decline isn’t good if it’s cause is people unable to afford homes or stagnate wages.

Hell, in the UK Birthrates plummeted because of the sheer damage Tories have caused us since they took over in 2008

It’s pretty clear, after all broken clocks are right twice a day

Exactly!

In Contrast: Israel, Czech, Georgia, France, etc all support egg freezing and IVF

Corbyn was also incompetent and didn’t keep his faction together, now Foxman is picking off the remnants one by one

They already did, while intercity rail is fast but you need a car or take the buses inside the cities

CCP ain’t going anywhere, Xi and his wannabe Tory self is up in the air

Maybe? I think the WSJ also talk’s about Xi’s speech but focus moreso on what Western experts are saying. I saw this on Reddit and decided to repost it on Lemmy

It’s helps that everything has links so we can verify

Cat lovers in a nutshell!