Cool. Then you get what you want, because this is exactly what tiktok is.
Cool. Then you get what you want, because this is exactly what tiktok is.
Still doesn’t make any sense at all. Is she suffering from some sort of eating disorder?
How about adressing the issue instead of just cresting strawmen about the messengers?
This feature is an actual fundamrntal privacy issue.
I think you should read up on which countries are former British colonies, because there are definitely a lot of them not doing so well either.
You will need some speakers with those amps though. The amps themselves won’t say anything.
It seems to me that the major issue people were complaining about was the thing even existing in the first place (and rightly so). So by them still wanting to implement it, they have fixed absolutely nothing.
*Mikkelsen. Mikkelson is Swedish, so kinda an insult to Danes.
This argument keeps missing that it is not only the quality but mainly the quantity of fakes which is going to be the problem. The complete undermining of trust in photographic evidence is seen as a good thing for so many nefarious vested interests, that this is an aim they will actively strive for.
It is the quantity of fakes because of the easy process which is going to be the problem. Fake pictures will very soon outnumber real, and the amount of them will still kerp grjwing exponentially even after that.
The thing is that in the future the mere quantity of fakes will make the careful vetting process you describe physically impossible. You will be bombarded with high quality fakes to such an extent that you will simply have to give up trying to keep up, so it will be a choice of either dropping the vetting process or dropping bringing any pictures altogether. For profit driven corporate jwbed media outlets, the choice unfortunately will be obvious.
Yeah, it is going to be mainly a quantity issue rather than a quality one. The quality of faked photos has already been high since photoshop. Now a constant growing avalanche of high quality fakes (produced by all sorts of different vested interests with their own particular purposes) is going to barrage us on a daily basis, simply because it is cheap and easy
Personally I think this kind of response shows how not ready we are, because it is grounded in the antiquated assumption that it is just more of the same old instead of a complete revolution in both the quality and quantity of fakery going to happen.
Well, we would have to know which country you hail from in order to know what constitutes a foreign language to you.
I havent used google as my search engine for a year now, I use duckduckgo instead, and it has been very few times where I have longed for (old) google.
The voterbase are largely Trump cultists, so they can’t without losing almost all of their voters.
Yeah, the “he just wants to learn” crowd is so incredibly disingenous, and completely ignores the very real political and commercial aspect of his show.
Its the spare. For when you are running out
And astroturfing AI-bots. So many bots.
The way the Supreme Court works in the US is not how it works in most other democratic countries. The combination of that system with Common Law is quite unique in fact.
So there are lots and lots of already existing alternatives as to how to place a Supreme Court differently.
Yeah, Trump has already been president once. There is no escaping being a laughing stock country after that one.