It’s definitely a medical room like the other commentor said. Most likely for somebody with long term limited mobility. Everything they need within 5 minutes of slow moving. I’ve had relatives who would have lived in rooms like this if they could have.
I agree with you there. It’s a known issue, the workaround is to load into comments.
Loads perfectly fine for me. FYI, you have to view the comments for the full image to load. If you click on it from the main feed, you’ll get the blurry low res version you posted.
Can you link to the post in question?
Infamous implies somebody is famous in a negative way. If anything, Gabe is a shining example that should be upheld.
Why would we discuss changing the law, rather than ensuring that it is applied indiscriminately? ANY law and punishment can be used to discriminate, and many are. By your logic if the police started prosecuting murderers in a biased manner, we should remove the law against murder.
Seems like I’m being attacked for something I didn’t say. My statement was purely a very minor thing, about how the issue is enforcement, not the actual law. And I certainly did not imply anything with it, but it seems a lot is being read into those few words that were not at all intended
? The law has been around a century, current controversy is that it’s not being applied equally
What about my statement is brutal? It’s not the law at fault, the law is impartial about all religious symbols. The problem is the lack of equal enforcement. Which is essentially what you’re saying in different words
That’s a problem with enforcement, not the law.
Not sure why you’re citing US law when we’re discussing foreign govts. Also the obvious thing signal can do, that most complainants would probably expect as a minimum, is banning their accounts and closing the group.
I don’t get what you’re trying to say at all. If a party is in a group chat and reports it, they can provide their credentials to Signal to enable Signal to view the contents of the chat.
Yes, they’re a carrier that does not know the content of what they carry. But once they are made aware, the legal system considers them to now bear responsibility if they don’t take action. Whether or not that’s fair is a pretty large topic, though I’m inclined to think so myself.
Funny how the .ml admins are so opposed to free speech on their own server, then.
Yes, but we’re discussing group chats disseminating piracy links. Do you think it’s harder to join such a group chat and report it to signal than it is to do all the cloak and dagger nonsense?
In a group chat, M wouldn’t be a 3rd party.
Becky sounds fun. Got her number?
It’s not a database. God, how many years is it going to take before people understand just what LLMs are and are not capable of?
That is what LLMs do in EVERY conversation. Most of the time you don’t notice it, because it fits your expectations.
No, because that requires it to understand the words. It doesn’t.
This is one side of the story. It’s entirely possible CF did provide those details