• Akasazh@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    This send to be quite heavily marketed on here. So many threads on this app throughout my feed.

    I dislike the use of a YouTube video over a web page, but that might just me being old fashioned

  • 👍Maximum Derek👍@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    I watched that earlier. Seems promising. I like that it’s open source but restricted enough that they can (at least try to) shut down anyone who forks it specifically to add ads or trackers. And it must be getting some interest because I haven’t been able to get the site to load yet.

      • jet@hackertalks.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        And violates point 1 The license shall not restrict any party from selling or giving away the software as a component of an aggregate software distribution containing programs from several different sources. … commercial distribution is forbidden in the license.

        And violates point 3 The license must allow modifications and derived works, and must allow them to be distributed under the same terms as the license of the original software.

        and violates point 4 Integrity of The Author’s Source Code no patch files are explicitly allowed_

        and point 6 - you already covered

        the futo license in question: https://gitlab.futo.org/videostreaming/grayjay/-/raw/master/LICENSE?ref_type=heads

      • thisfro@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        That is one definition of open source

        I agree that it is great to meet all these criteria, but especially restricting commercial use is a pretty reasonable thing to do

        • JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          I would say that Open Source, by any definition of the word, does have the assumption that you are allowed to modify and publish what you create at least in some form or another, even if it would be under a non-commercial clause or a license with other requirements.

          When the licence explicitly says all you are allowed to do is access the code “solely for the purposes of review, compilation and non-commercial distribution”, that’s not open source.

  • Oz0ne@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Testing it out and it defaults to 720p30 (30fps I assume). When I switch it to 1080p60, video playback begins to freeze/lag. So, sticking with revamced for now.