• Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    194
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Pot, meet kettle.

    To add to this, at least Android being open source allows for alternative versions that can be used on some hardware that truly don’t track and can be consistently supported long term. With Apple’s devices, that’s not a practical option.

    Edit:

    From the news today:

    Google’s relationship with Apple is particularly significant given its unilateral access to iPhone customers. Internal Google notes of a meeting between Sundar Pichai and Apple CEO Tim Cook released Monday by the DOJ give an interesting insight into that relationship. The meeting, which began as a discussion of the regulatory environment in D.C. eventually turned toward the question of Google’s place as the default search engine on Apple products.

    Cook, according to the notes, told Pichai he believes the two companies were “deep partners; deeply connected where our services end and yours begin.” In another note from the meeting, Pichai reportedly said, “Our vision is that we work as if we are one company.” Pichai tried to distance himself from that line during this testimony on Monday.

    Oh boy, oh boy, oh boy!

    • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      No kettle here, just a couple of pots. The kettle is shiny and reflective. The pot is seeing its own reflection in the kettle. Hence there’s no kettle in this scenario.

      • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        67
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yes. LineageOS and GrapheneOS among other forks are some obvious counterexamples to the narrative that Android isn’t open source. Then there are the countless vendors that use it in China without Google software. I know it’s cool to hate on Google and I do partake but that’s simply a fact.

        • BorgDrone@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          26
          ·
          11 months ago

          Those are missing major parts of a full Android system. Play Services is a huge one.

            • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              11 months ago

              Or your own proprietary implementation if you’re making an Android device yourself and you were lazy.

            • BorgDrone@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              11 months ago

              Go buy any Android phone from a major brand (Google, Samsung, etc) try to rebuild the OS as it’s installed from the factory from source. You can’t.

              Even theAOSP based Android distros like LineageOS ship with closed source binary blobs for crucial parts of the OS.

              Calling Android OSS is a marketing gimmick to trick nerds into choosing Android.

              • helenslunch@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                I don’t know how to rebuild shit but certainly plenty of people can and have.

                There are dozens of forks of Android so I don’t know how you can NOT call it OSS.

                • BorgDrone@lemmy.one
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  You can build a version of Android, but not the version that is installed on the device you buy in the store.

                  There are dozens of forks of Android so I don’t know how you can NOT call it OSS.

                  Because even those forks ship closed source binary blobs. You simply cannot build an Android phone with 100% open source. The phones you can actually buy in the store? A huge part of those is closed source.

      • elouboub@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        36
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Android is opensource. It has closed source components, but they aren’t necessary to run Android.

        • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          And they’re completely replaceable as there are clean interfaces between the closed source components and the open source base.

        • bigmclargehuge@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          11 months ago

          Exactly. It’s like saying Linux isn’t open source because some distros come with proprietary NVidia drivers.

        • BorgDrone@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          11 months ago

          Mayor parts that are very much necessary for a fully functional Android system are closed source. Play Services is a big one.

          • thisisawayoflife@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Yes. I would like to see a DIY selfhosted replacement for play services that is a direct swap in, in the sense that as an end user I couldn’t tell the difference (notifications primarily)

            Edit: wow! Didn’t realize selfhosting replacements for Google services is so controversial!